In appearance an amazingly abstract aberration, amalgamated as both an accident and anti-heroic. Advancing additional absurd affirmations apropos of appearances, I astound and amaze at the artistry of my actual aesthetic. As always I’m against agents of avarice and apathy, and all of those acquiescent among atrocities. I abhor the asinine acclamations of amoral agendas and antagonize, apprehend, and all out attack the appalling arrogance of artificial attitudes. Although awfully animated and alert I’m also assumed to not at all assuage angels and annihilate anguish amongst all of those abused. An amatory artist and above average aptitude amorously, alluring adults and adolescents alike asking to amplify arousal and alleviate all anginal ache. Advancing about altruism, ameliorating all affiliations, and always around to avail anyone, I’m not arrogant but in actuality an anomaly. Although to avoid anymore audacious alliteration allow me to introduce myself as Andrew :)
the infant who’s gender is not yet determined, but it looks like the artist is leaning toward male is covered
what I take from this is once again is black women are never to be covered or protected, even as their sole purpose to ankhs as the manufactures of their sons, sons who are to be protected and covered at all costs
Open your third eye to that.
True, but how do you know it’s not homage to the male artist’s mother? Maybe his mom read while pregnant with him and to him and he felt it played a huge role in the man that he became. I haven’t read too far into “ankh shit” but outside of those extremist that make ridiculous memes, it’s actually very intriguing, from what I have read. As far as her being naked what would you rather? It seems to me that you’re dissecting the piece by the surface level qualities of nudity and gender. I take it as the recognition of power of the transference of energy. Sure it would’ve been nice if there was a set of twins in there, I guess. Also, there are “girls” who have low-cuts and wear glasses so the gender up to you to assume lol (even though I’m sure his intention was for the offspring to be seen as a boy)
he couldn’t put clothes on his own momma?
With illustrations such as these the womans face is either half way or partially missings
she is always naked
she is always thin yet her belly is always full with child and her breasts perky and a boy is always inside
it’s not about celebrating women as much as it is the pornification of black women.
A naked black woman does not only symbolize sex. It symbolizes where we came from, nurturing, nature, God. At least to me. The black woman’s body is beautiful, oversexualized or not. We make for great art.
Wait… Something is wrong. Last time I saw this post dynastylnoire wasn’t the one that wrote those comments. Did someone change it to her or am I missing something?